The origin of the "Universe"
Proto-space
Proto-space is an entirely new cosmological conceptualization defining the nature of the Universe. It completely starts over at the beginning of the question, "What Constitutes the Nature of the Universe." Proto-space has absolutely no constructs of, relativity, quantum mechanics, strings, brane, time, or multi-dimensionalism/multiverse. Proto-space is pure physical mechanics that describes the actual nature of the Universe...
Because this is totally new physics from the ground up, you must read it slowly, and think about the constructs it formulates. If you find any errors in its constructs or logic, please post them to teach us all.
This synopsis is an abstract overview of Proto-space; for a complete mechanically detailed discussion, review the DSFF PowerPoint presentation.
-----------------
Proto-space
What is the phenomenon composing the physical volume of space:
Space, outer space, the vacuum of space, by whichever name ‘Space’ has never been successfully quantified or physically defined. Space makes up more than 99.999999% of the volume of the universe. Stars, planets, rock, ice, dust, and gas, compose less than .000001% of the volume in space. Space is vastly the most abundant aspect of the cosmos.
When we look at the universe, we see a continuum of physical volume in all directions. We see volume everywhere we look out, and everywhere we look in. We see that space is translucent. We see light and galaxies moving through space. Aside from how matter and energy behave within space, space itself appears separate, not dependent on matter or energy to exist.
So what is space? After removing, matter, energy, and gravity, space is just physical volume. We can call this physical volume ‘Proto-space’.
Proto-space has three obvious dimensions composing its volume: height, width, and length. As well, volume is the measurement/amount of something physical, in other words substance. Therefore, Proto-space is a composition of substance and volume. The least physical state that space can be reduced to is four dimensions; three of volume, and one of composing substance. Each is an absolute constituent of physical space. Take any one of the four dimensions away - and the structural causation of physical volume ceases to exist. The physical volume composing Proto-space is the elementary foundation of physical existence.
The nature of physical causation:
Something cannot physically exist 'just because'; physical existence must have a physical construct formulating its existence. Anything less is magic - not science. Proto-space is the physical alternative to 'just because'.
Beginning with the physical origin of space:
The volume of Proto-space cannot have a beginning, for the basic reason that, something cannot come into existence within non-existence (volume that does not exist.) In addition, a finite volume (bubble) cannot exist within non-existence for the same reason; thus, if any volume exists, it must be infinite in origin. As well, Proto-space cannot cease to exist. Physical existence (volume) is a tangible substance; it cannot produce or generate nothingness (non-existence.) Neither ‘physical space’ nor ‘non-existence’ can be generated or produced by the other. For this reason, physical space cannot have a beginning or end.
Space is not simply a vacuum of volume, a just because thing, that matter and energy exist within without physical explanation. Space itself is a physical thing, constituted by physical constructs. We see galaxies expanding out into pre-existing space, thus, space precedes their approach, proving that space exists before matter and energy. Matter and energy are made from something, and Proto-space is the only material available before their creation. Therefore, the substance that composes Proto-space must also compose, matter, energy, and gravity. There is nowhere else for, matter, energy, and gravity, to come from.
It is a very serious question; space is either, a super-physical, supernatural, or a magical construct; or, it is an absolute physical construct in every way shape and form. It cannot be both ways, each is contrary to the other. The volume of space makes up the vast majority of what constitutes the universe. Its causation is paramount. Space is the vast majority of the universe, and it had to exist first, for matter and energy to exist within. (Super-physical, supernatural, etc... means a simulation of fact without actual factual data, solely based on suppositional criterion and equations.)
The physical volume of Proto-space is the RosettaStone in deciphering the nature of the material universe. Decipher the physical volume of space correctly, and the rest falls into place.
The Constitutional Laws of Existence:
The Constitutional Laws of Existence (CLE,) decipher the absolute parameters of physical existence. They do so by dissecting what must be present for the causation of ‘physical existence’, in-of-itself to exist. The CLE laws are simple, commonsense, and straightforward logic. They are the founding principles of physical existence. CLE represents that substance is the fourth physical dimension composing three-dimensional volume, wherever it may exist.
Think about the following constructs:
Starting from the causation of volume; in fact, to physically exist, two fundamental components must be present, ‘Substance and Volume‘. Where one exists so must the other, each is a function of the other. Substance cannot exist without volume, nor volume exist without substance. Both are synonymous functions of physical existence. The absence of either volume or substance is nonexistence. Though each is a function of the other, volume does not cause substance; substance causes volume. Volume is the physical manifestation of substance; the presents of substance, occupies/creates the causation of volume.
Consider, does anything exist that has no volume; no volume means no amount of a composing substance. If there is no amount of a substance, then there is nothingness. A volume of nothingness is a paradox/oxymoron, because volume is a measurement of amount, thus, a volume of nothingness results in a fatal paradox. The only logical solution is that where volume exists, so must composing substance. A vacuum in space only means that there are no atoms or molecules, it can even mean no electromagnetic energy as well, but a vacuum does not mean there is no volume or other substances.
Consider a further consequence; can a finite volume (bubble) exist within nothingness? If there is nothing, there cannot be something within nothing. Accordingly, if any volume exists, it must be infinite. As well, volume cannot come into existence within nothingness for the same reason; furthermore, something cannot be made from nothingness, thus, if volume exists, it has always existed. Regardless of how you approach the question, it always comes back to a substance issue that must compose the physical causation of volume; and since volume must be infinite, so must its composing substance.
What begins as simple semantics becomes profound logic that deciphers the physical nature and causation of volume/space. The causation of 'Volume/space' can be mechanically expressed as four absolute constructs: 1) Substance, 2) Height, 3) Width, and 4) Length; taking any one or more of these components away equals nothingness. The constructs/causation generating the volume of space cannot be reduced any further without becoming a fatal paradox. Thus, Proto-space is the least state of physical existence.
The constitutional constructs of physical existence can be stated in three simple laws that describe the elemental foundation of physically existing.
The Constitutional Laws of Existence – CLE
1) Volume must have substance to exist.
2) Substance must have volume to exist.
3) Volume cannot create or exist within nothingness/nonexistence.
Appling the CLE laws to the volume of space reveals that space must be infinite in both volume and substance, and that space has always existed. There is no other physical alternative. Each construct is an absolute infinite value. Proto-space represents the origin of the physical universe, and provides a material source that ultimately produces matter and energy. The CLE laws are the fundamental laws of nature. They are also the founding geometry of the universe. From an engineering point of view, infinite volume and substance provides a lot of space and material to work with, in building the material universe. Considering space as anything less than ‘absolutely physical’ is an exercise in futility, because physical volume obviously exists, therefore, it must have causation, a quantifiable physical/mechanical definition. Anything less is super-physical/magical and not quantifiable.
Proto-space has no reference of time because it has no beginning or end. Time is a measurement of duration. Without a beginning or end, there is nothing to measure. However, if an event occurs within Proto-space, that is a reference point that can be measured from; but it would only be an arbitrary measurement, not a physical component of the event itself. Time is only an arbitrary value that measures the durations of events. Time is not a, structural, functional, or mechanical, requirement of physically existing. Mechanically, the volume and substance composing Proto-space does not need ‘physical time’ as a component to exist. Proto-space does not exist within time, but arbitrary-time can be applied within Proto-space...
Time does not physically exist. Time is not a physical component of Proto-space on any level; time is only a conceptual arbitrary measurement of duration. There are no "timeons" or "time-dimensions" in nature. Time is simply a vector, no different from the measurements of direction or position. Time is only a measurement of duration, just as an inch is a measurement of length, neither cause nor affect what they measure.
The solution to deciphering the nature of the universe is in the physical volume of space itself. CLE deciphers what the physical nature/causation of the volume composing the universe must be in order to exist. CLE reveals that space is composed of infinite substance and volume; and because matter is expanding out into preexisting space, ultimately, the substance that forms the material universe must come from the composing Proto-space itself. Since physical volume had to come first, matter and energy must be the derivatives of volume; in other words... a product of its physicalness.
The CLE laws provide a material description that defines the physical nature of space to simple absolute terms. No other components are needed to qualify or quantify the physical causation/presence of space. The proof of physical space is the volume of space itself. Space/volume cannot exist without a physical construct; that would be magic. Simply look at what must exist for existence in-of-itself to occur, the CLE Laws, and space becomes self-quantifying.
The structural foundation of Proto-space is denoted as: Proto-space is infinite in volume and substance = ‘∞’; it is defined by the CLE laws = ‘C’; and, it is in a static state defined as a field or continuum = ‘f’, therefore mechanically expressed as ∞Cf (InfiniteCfield.) Structurally, Proto-space is a homogeneous continuum; or in other words, an infinite volume of mono-substance.
To visualize Proto-space, imagine a translucent shade of gray substance, extending infinitely in all directions, which has no physical definition other than its volume. There is no matter or energy. There is no center or edge, no up or down; it cannot vibrate, ripple, bend, or curve. There is no time, temperature, perspective, sound, or motion, just a static homogeneous continuum of physical volume. The material universe is derived from this physical origin.
Mechanics:
Mass, is the total quantity of something physical - not necessarily defined by volume. The mass of Proto-space is one (1×∞.) Proto-space is a homogeneous infinity that has no form or boundaries, thus, it functions as a single source. Though it seems odd to equate infinity as a single source, and assign its mass as a value of one (1,) "one" is the only functional or mechanical numeric value that could apply to Proto-space, since it is a homogeneous substance.
However, within a given finite volume (a bubble,) within 1×∞ (Proto-space,) both mass and density can increase or change without affecting the value of infinity. Infinity minus a zillion2 still equals infinity. ∞Cf is the only ‘absolute infinity’ that will ever exist, because it is the proto volume and substance composing the universe in-of-itself; it cannot have a beginning or end; thus, its mass will always equal 1×∞.
Density, is the amount of mass within a finite volume. The ambient density of Proto-space is also one (1.) The degree of density is called its ‘Magnitude’ (M.) ∞Cf has a density magnitude of 1M, which is its least state of physical existence. Proto-space has two physical states of existence: static/rest = ∞Cf×1M (InfiniteCfield,) and dynamic/elastic = mCf ≥ 2M (magneticCfield.) A portion of ∞Cf becomes dynamic mCf, when a finite volume (bubble) has a density/magnitude greater than 1M. 1M is static; a density ≥ than 2M is dynamic. ("≥" means equal to or greater in value.)
The density of Proto-space can never change; it cannot go from 1M to 2M. Because Proto-space is a homogeneous continuum, there is nowhere where it could obtain additional material to increase its density; it cannot create it out of nothing - that would be magic. On the other hand, a finite volume/bubble of greater density can exist within the ambient density of Proto-space. Though the density of Proto-space is an absolute constant, finite corpuscular units are not absolute values and can change in density. Infinity is an absolute value, and thus the volume and density of Proto-space are absolute; finite volumes cannot affect the volume and density of Proto-space. Finite volume, no matter how big it is, can never change the density of Proto-space, or ever take up more than an infinitesimal spot within the infinity of Proto-space.
The volume of Proto-space is mechanically inert, only its composing substance is dynamic. The composing substance of Proto-space is a mono-dynamic fluid (monolithic continuum) that can only express density differentiations in the form of finite volumes of greater/lesser density.
Materialization:
The ability to generate matter and energy is an attribute of Proto-space; there is nowhere else for matter and energy to come from. The only factor that can change in Proto-space is a finite volume of its density. The only mechanical function or force that could cause the substance of Proto-space to change in density is a magnetic propensity towards itself. There is no other internal function that is actionable that can alter density. This function is called ‘Monomagneticforce’. The material universe must be the product of something, which requires substance; ‘density differentiation’ is the only way to provide that composing material from a homogeneous substance.
A magnetic propensity towards itself only has two possible directions it can take, attraction towards greater or lesser density. Analyzing these two possibilities clearly demonstrates which magnetic propensity is correct.
As an analysis;
1) If a finite volume (bubble) of ‘lesser density’ existed within Proto-space, and magnetic attraction was towards the lesser density, Proto-space would attract into the volume of the lesser density, increasing its density until equalizing with the ambient background density. As well, if a finite volume of ‘greater density’ existed within Proto-space, the greater density would also attract into the lesser density, dissolving until equalizing with the ambient background density. Attraction towards lesser density fills in the lesser density until equalized. If density is attracted towards lesser density, any differentiation would always equalize back to the ambient background density. This is non-conducive towards generating a material universe.
2) If a finite volume (bubble) of ‘greater density’ existed within Proto-space, and lesser density is attracted towards greater density; that would result in a perpetual collapse of the lesser ambient background density into the volume of the greater density; generating progressively greater densities. As well, if a finite volume of ‘lesser density’ existed within greater density, the volume of lesser density would attract towards the greater ambient density, dissolving or equalizing into the ambient density. This allows for consolidation and diffusion of density. If density is attracted towards greater density, any differentiation of greater density would cause a perpetual attraction of lesser density into greater density. This is conducive towards generating a material universe. Therefore, the Monomagneticforce of Proto-space must be attraction towards greater density.
There are two types of Monomagneticforce, Symmetrygeneration, and SymmetryDegeneration:
1) Symmetrygeneration is the process of attraction towards a finite volume of greater density.
2) SymmetryDegeneration is the process of attraction towards the greater ambient density.
Both follow the path of attraction towards greater density.
Force:
Force, is an influence exerted towards something. A single homogeneous substance can only produce a single force; there are only two possible forces, attraction, or repulsion. Force must have a continuous physical connection to that which it is affecting to have an effect. The Monomagneticforce of Proto-space is a one-way mono-magnetic attraction towards greater density; it has no poles or repulsion. Monomagneticforce is the only force in nature, because there is only one substance that composes all aspects of nature.
(( Supplemental note: In the material universe, a single force would appear to be contrary to everyday experience since magnetic fields seem to exert both an attractive and repulsive force towards one another; however, Dimensional Symmetry Field Formations - DSFF, mechanically demonstrates that this is actually Monomagneticforce (attraction towards greater density) attracting together or pulling the magnetic fields apart. DSFF, are the formational mechanics from Proto-space formulating into the material universe; however, they are not demonstrated in this abstract. This abstract only deals with the foundational constructs (causation) of Proto-space (physical volume,) and its mechanical force. For a complete discussion and PowerPoint presentation of Proto-space and DSFF, click the “DSFF” PowerPoint presentation tab in the navigation bar at the bottom of this synopsis. There you will find the illustrated mechanics from 'A to Z' formulating every phenomena/aspect composing the totality of the material universe. ))
The combined density of Substance and its Monomagneticforce is called ‘Magneticmagnitude’, denoted as ‘m’, and expressed with density magnitude as ‘Mm’. The complete description of Proto-space in the static/rest state is expressed as ∞Cf×1Mm (InfiniteCfield times one Magneticmagnitude.) In a dynamic state, it is expressed as mCf ≥ 2Mm (magneticCfield ‘a finite volume’ equal to or greater in density than two Magneticmagnitude.) Mm represents the density of Proto-space and its Monomagneticforce at any given point, whether reflecting background/ambient density, or the differential density structures in Symmetrygeneration/Degeneration fields, which compose the material universe.
Fluidics':
Proto-space mechanically functions as a mono-dynamic fluid. It is a homogeneous continuum of substance with zero viscosity, and has Monomagneticforce. This is called a ‘Monomagneticfluid’. The Monomagneticfluid (substance) of Proto-space is elastic, it can stretch, or condense, but it cannot break its homogeneous structure. There must always be symmetry continuity (Symmetrycontinuity/gradients) between differential densities. Monomagneticfluid cannot be stretched into nonexistence or nothingness; it can only be stretched to its least state of physical existence of 1Mm.
The Monomagneticfluid of Proto-space stretches ‘as decreased Mm’, or condenses ‘as increased Mm’, but it cannot break its homogeneous continuity. It is not possible to have a bubble of nonexistence within physical existence. A volume of non-existence within physical existence is a structural paradox...
The Monomagneticfluid composing Proto-space, at its least state of physical existence, functions as a non-corpuscular homogeneous solid, but within finite volumes, functions as a differential mono-dynamic fluid. Regardless of how Mm is stretched or compressed, it will always maintain Symmetrycontinuity(gradients) between differential densities. Just as temperature or acceleration must have gradients between changing degrees/velocities, Monomagneticfluid must also have gradients between differential densities.
The volume of Proto-space is not elastic; it cannot stretch or condense. It cannot be compressed, expanded, twisted, or curved, it is not a tangible construct because it has no boundary or shape to stretch or condense. As a result, the infinite volume of Proto-space is mechanically inert. Volume only becomes mechanically relevant when it represents a finite measurement of volume within Proto-space. The Monomagneticfluid (substance) composing Proto-space is elastic; the volume representing Proto-space is not elastic.
The composing substance of Mm is the reactant property of Proto-space. Volume does not cause substance; substance causes volume. Though each is a function of the other, substance is the dynamic aspect or reactant property of Proto-space; volume is only an inert measurement. Finite volume on the other hand, is both a measurement and a physical constituent of the material universe. Finite volume ‘corpuscular units’ represents independent quantities that integrate with one-another -- forming larger complex systems (matter) within Proto-space. Monomagneticforce drives these independent quantities into dynamic systems that construct the material universe. The physical causation of Proto-space is also the mechanical causation/origin of the material universe.
Motion:
Concerning the causation of motion. Motion and inertia are different things. Inertia is the tendency of something to remain in a given state of ‘rest or motion’, until influenced by another force. Velocity, acceleration, and momentum, measures what motion does, but do not describe the internal mechanics of what sustains motion. An object moving unimpeded through space does not ‘just-move’ without cause; its motion must be sustained by a constant mechanical interaction between the object and the space it moves within. Monomagneticforce is the mechanics of motion, and inertia is the description of motion.
Monomagneticforce generates both the proto motion, and the underlying causation, sustaining all physical motion within the material universe. Inertia measures what motion does; Monomagneticforce mechanically explains what motion is, and, how and why sustained motion occurs.
(See DSFF for a complete mechanical description of motion.)
In summary:
The CLE laws quantify the physical nature of space to absolute mechanical terms. They are based entirely on facts and straightforward logic. The transparent nature of space kept scientists from seeing what was there; the CLE laws expose space for what it is, a four dimensional physical continuum of substance and volume.
Spend a few moments imagining this substance composing Proto-space. As a metaphoric analogy, Proto-space can be looked at as both the womb and embryonic fluid, which the material universe is derived from, and exists within. The composing substance of Proto-space ‘Monomagneticfluid’, and its only force ‘Monomagneticforce’, are all that is needed to formulate every aspect of the material universe; its volume, force, matter, energy, gravity, magnetism, and motion, are all derivatives of the composing substance generating the causation of Proto-space.
Proto-space is the mechanical definition defining the physical volume composing space. It can be quantified to absolute, mass, density, and force; and it is the raw building material that ultimately composes the material universe. Proto-space is the least state of physical existence. It is a homogeneous monomagnetic volume of substance, composing the infinity of space. "One substance, one force; before anything else existed." Proto-space (∞Cf) is the factually substantiated origin of the physical and material universe. Proto-space is timeless.
The alternative is that space is a mosaic of multiple/parallel/multi-dimensional universes (multiverses,) composed of curved space-time, the big bang/inflation, strings (quantum filaments,) dark matter/energy/flow, black-holes, wormholes, and time dilation/time-travel. Seems akin to Alice-in-Wonderland conceptualizations.
Modern science believes that, space, matter, energy, and gravity, exceed common sense, and can only be understood by elaborate equations based upon suppositions. Upon this criterion, anything can be expressed using superphysical equations; factual proof is not necessary.
In conclusion: Is the nature of our universe "superphysical," or "absolutely physical." It cannot be both ways, each is contrary to the other. Are superphysical conceptualizations a foundation that our future can stand upon. Contrary to orthodox views, if the universe is absolutely physical in, every way, shape, and form (Proto-space,) then present/orthodox physics and cosmology has a serious problem...
Additional data on 'The origin of the Universe' can be found in the topics, The nature of "Time," or "DSFF," and cosmology books. As well, there is an enormous amount of data on the Internet with different perspectives. Research and learn about what it is to be human, and why we 'believe and behave' as we do. All you have to lose is ignorance.
A question never asked is worth nothing,
An answer never given is worth even less...
What are your opinions, comments, or questions?
Home page | About the Author | Contact info | Posting instructions | Posting Board
The origin of the "Universe" | The nature of "Light and Colors" | The nature of "Time"
The nature of "Dreams" | The nature of "Technological Discovery" | The nature of "Human Behavior"
The nature of "Morals" | The nature of "Religion" | "DSFF" PowerPoint presentation